Product Design
HMI
Delivery robot
A collaborative HMI
Robot
size and interaction must be appropriate to public perception and pedestrian traffic, meet social
acceptance and confidence in public space. To meet these requirements, we designed a multimodal
interface.
This project was done in collaboration with the Singapore and Babenhausen design teams.
Cooperation with other bots and human
We propose technologies and functions that facilitate communication and user comprehension, to support seamless interactions. Regarding context, robot must behave as an introvert or extravert and interact with people nearby.
What did we do ?
Scope & Project brief
01
Analysis
We benchmarked competition, evaluated market expectations and identified usage context.
02
Product
We explored 3 design solutions for robot crossing & mobility and user access to loadings.
03
HMI
We designed a multimodal (visual and audio) interface to establish user trust and safety.
04
Testing
We evaluated robot interface with two scenarios (street crossing and goods delivery).
In the coming years, autonomous vehicles will populate our urban environment. Trust and acceptance are key factors to enable the harmonious development of new services. Seamless cooperation between intelligent automated delivery robots and pedestrians is necessary to ensure safe and efficient use in public spaces.
Challenges
Define a collaborative HMI for a delivery robot to enhance human-machine cooperation and test and evaluate interactions in VR (virtual reality).
Goals
Analysis
The journey of a delivery robot
This scenario defines the different milestones and the three types of encounters that the robot usually goes through.
Product Design Concepts
Concept 1
Six wheels chassis for crossing optimization for floor projections on each sides, symmetrical design (product and interface)
Concept 2
360° communication, neutral body styling, handles on the top to attract user attention and robust chassis. This concept was selected.
Concept 3
Closest design to existing Continental robot, agility, user oriented front and transparent cover.
HMI
Multimodal Interactions
Enabling seamless use of different interaction modes, context dependent, for optimized comprehension and usability.
Sound AVAS 0km/h
Speech, “Please, Pass by”
Expressive light + Mast idle + Mirror effect
Eyes Calm
Body language lean forward
Ground projection of direction that idles
Example of combined interactions
Asking a pedestrian to move away as it is blocking the robot’s path
Testing in VR
Simulated context and actions
Evaluate each interface to identify the best combination
The procedure
Each individual will start with an interview to evaluate user expectations towards delivery robots.
Then, testers will proceed to three runs of tests; low, mid and high, which corresponds to different levels of interaction on behalf of the delivery robot. After each run, testers will be asked to assess their experience.
At the end, a final interview resumes their overall observations.
The goal
The goal was to find out whether it is easy to get familiar with the product, and if the user feels in control with interactions, and so, users like or dislike the product?
How were the levels of interaction defined ?
Low feedback
No visual interactions
Very restricted communication
skills
Mid feedback
Safety interactions
Several HMI features:
LED band, ground projection, sound effects, antenna light signal
Does not speak
High feedback
Humanoid interactions
Several HMI features:
LED band, ground projection, sound effects, antenna light signal
Can speak
Humanoid facial expressions & body language
Locations
Two testing locations were set, Babenhausen and Singapore to understand whether culture might have an impact on results.
Participants
33 participants took part to prototype tests. Their age ranged between 20 and 48 years old.
Example of a user going through the ‘High’ experience
What did we learn from this ?
Results from user testing
SAFE
FRIENDLY
NAVIGATING
FAST
AGILE
SMALL
EFFICIENT
Characteristics of an ideal delivery robot
An important question that was part of the first interview ‘Which typical characteristics should a delivery robot have?’ reveals that safety was the most important aspect to prospective users.
Robot “High feedback” fulfills users’ expectations of safety and communication
User feedbacks about selected / preferred features:
Most of the HMI features are desired by the testers, whereas speech and earcons perform a little less.
Expressive lights
More information should be displayed on top of the robot
Sounds interactions
Too frequent
“Please let me through” is a difficult message
Instructions while driving are disturbing in crowded streets
Anthropomorphic light display
Changing eyes are scary